Recent cases suggest that, in serious cases, cops are still looking for ways around Arizona v. Miranda and it’s progeny. The requirement in Wisconsin that questioning of suspects be recorded is exposing the tricks of investigators bent on getting a confession, even over the requests of suspects to exercise their right to remain silent or to have representation of counsel.
The most recently exposed strategy is to temporarily leave a suspect alone after he declines to answer questions but then to send another team of detectives at him later to again try to get him to answer questions. This is an attempt to take advantage of a window opened by Michigan v Mosely, which seems to allow such a tactic if it can be said that the suspect’s right to remain silent was “scrupulously honored”. However, that standard has been shifting a bit since that case was decided and courts sometimes seem to be taking into account how badly their analysis would hurt the state’s case.
The point here is that the best decision a suspect can make, whether guilty or innocent, is to absolutely and without equivocation, refuse to answer any questions without a lawyer being present. As soon as the tape starts running, suspects should loudly announce that they do not wish to make a statement and they want a lawyer NOW. If it gets on tape and the cops don’t erase it, your rights should be protected later. www.reddinandsinger.com








